Liberty, Equality, Fraternity Does Not Apply to France’s Muslim Population

On 16 October, French teacher Samuel Paty was decapitated outside his secondary school in a Paris suburb while on his way home. The attacker, 18-year old Abdullakh Anzorov, a Russian-born refugee of Chechen descent, was allegedly enraged by the teacher’s sharing of Charlie Hebdo’s controversial cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad with his class a week and a half before the attack. 

The satirical magazine prides itself on its non-conformist position and often publishes controversial material. For example, the portrayal of the black former French Justice Minister Christiane Taubira as an ape and the well-publicised inflammatory cartoon images of the Prophet – both apparently in jest. When such actions are criticised, the perpetrators often remind us that those who are not francophone simply wouldn’t understand. 

Nonetheless, in spite of the cartoons’ controversial nature, Paty opted to show them to his students to illustrate the concept of liberty. A parent from the school criticised Paty’s choice as Islamophobic, and following this dispute which was amplified online, Paty’s life was brutally taken.  

Populist gains

Unsurprisingly, the attack has provoked debate both nationally and globally surrounding freedom of speech and the place of Muslimness, namely the presence of Muslims and those perceived to be Muslim, alongside the existence of Muslim sites and customs, in French society and the West more broadly.

The former is allegedly under threat given the Muslim presence in France, a position that conveniently sidelines the needs for sensitivity and mutual understanding among citizens from effective liberties for all, but this of course would need to be predicated by the acknowledgement of French Muslims as equal citizens. 

Darmanin’s demonisation of Muslim associations in France is riddled with incoherences and hypocrisies, has he forgotten the 1901 French law guaranteeing the freedom of association for all in France?

On Muslimness, French Interior Minister, Gérald Darmanin, took to Twitter on 19 October to call for the dissolution of Muslim-led and Muslim-centred anti-racist organisations, such as BarakaCity and the Collective Against Islamophobia in France (CCIF).

Darmanin went as far as describing these organisations as “enemies of the [French] Republic”. Darmanin’s comments are not isolated, rather they comprise part of a broader French political discourse, bordering on obsession, with Muslimness in France and its presumed alterity, incompatibility and backwardness.

While there has been a strong global call to support these organisations, arguably the damage is already done given the wide scale public demonisation of these organisations and their work. Furthermore, these narratives, in spite of their origins in the left-wing liberal tradition, create fertile ground for populist gains in France, evidenced by the ever-growing success of Le Pen’s Front National now known as the Rassemblement National. 

Darmanin’s demonisation of Muslim associations in France is riddled with incoherences and hypocrisies, has he forgotten the 1901 French law guaranteeing the freedom of association for all in France?

Defining laïcité

In a speech on 2 October and prior to Paty’s murder, the French President, Emmanuel Macron, spoke out to condemn alleged Islamic separatism in the country in which he drew on the French conception of laïcité or secularism.

Thousands of people hold a march against Islamophobia in Paris. The banner reads Islamophobia kills on 10 November, 2019 (Reuters)

In spite of laïcité’s philosophical egalitarian basis under which it was intended that there should be a separation of Church and State, it is widely accepted that today laïcité in France is no longer about secularism and neutrality, rather it is a normative mode for the exclusion and targeting of Muslimness in France and has been this way for some time. 

It is widely accepted that laïcité in France today is no longer about secularism and neutrality, rather it a normative mode for the exclusion and targeting of Muslimness in France

This Islamophobic positioning through the lens of laïcité demonstrated by the French executive level is mirrored by that of the legislative and judiciary.

The evocation of laïcité to control Muslimness in France is clearly demonstrated in legislative measures, such as the 2010 law against the covering of one’s face, popularly dubbed the “Loi anti-niqab” (anti-niqab law), and the 2004 “Loi Stasi” (Stasi law) that saw the French Muslim schoolgirls prohibited from wearing a headscarf in schools, measures implemented in spite of the relatively low numbers of women who would be impacted.

Arguably these measures are less about secularism and more about controlling Muslimness, creating a public and political narrative, backed by legal frameworks which seek to create a normative myth of Muslims’, and especially Muslim women’s, otherness in France and this political signalling sadly often marks Muslims and particularly Muslim women out as alleged legitimate targets.

A Muslim ‘brain drain’

As is always the case whenever such events occur, Muslims worldwide came forward to condemn the attacks. Notwithstanding, as is often seen, the events provoked further attacks against Muslims in the country. For example, two visibly Muslim women wearing headscarves were attacked and stabbed by two French women at the foot of the Eiffel Tower in Paris last week.

The attackers shouted at the Muslim women, calling them “dirty Arabs” and telling the Muslim women that “this [France] was not their home”, before forcibly removing the Muslim women’s headscarves.

This type of attack is not unusual in France; the CCIF received in 2019 alone 789 reports of Islamophobic attacks, a 77 percent increase from two years prior. Although such statistics are shocking, as with all hate crime statistics, these figures represent just the tip of the iceberg and due to multiple factors, such as reporting bias, we will never truly know the depth and scale of Islamophobic attacks. 

Furthermore, international commentators were critical noting that this specific attack on the two Muslim women detailed above received very little media coverage, this was at a time when many French media outlets were fixated on Islam. 

Juxtaposed with this situation, there have been growing reports of French Muslims now leaving the country, essentially France is experiencing a Muslim “brain drain”. Those who can flee France appear to be doing so, but this is not in spite of stating “I love my country, but I’m not going to spend the rest of my life apologising for being Muslim. I go where I am respected.” 

This represents the reality that, in the midst of a global pandemic where many even in France are losing their lives due to Covid-19, there is still an unhealthy obsession with Muslimness in the country and furthermore, this fixation will ultimately impoverish and disadvantage France, and take away from its potential for ever celebrating its rich cultural diversity.

Ultimately France stands to lose out in all of this affair.


By Amina Easat-Daas
Source: Middle East Eye

(Visited 32 times, 1 visits today)