North Korea’s “New” Course, and its Nuclear Missile Moratorium

On April 20, in Pyongyang, the Third Plenary Meeting of the Seventh Central Committee of the Worker’s Party of Korea was held “to discuss the policy issues of a new stage in line with the demand of the important historic period of the revolution’s development.” A plenary session ranks second in importance in intraparty actions after a congress, and typically is not assembled for ordinary matters.

The decree “On the announcement of the great victory of the course for parallel management of economic development and the development of nuclear armed forces” announced triumphantly that:

  • “. . . critical nuclear tests and underground nuclear tests were conducted. Nuclear weapons were miniaturized and reduced in weight. Extra-large nuclear weapons and their launch platforms were developed, resulting in the solid achievement of nuclear weapons armament.” In other words, although some military experts do not believe it, the program for creation of strategic nuclear forces is declared complete.
  • Since April 21, 2018 North Korea has ceased nuclear tests and test launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Moreover, “to ensure a transparent guarantee of the cessation of nuclear tests, North Korea will stop use of the northern testing site.”
  • Also, a promise has been made “not to use nuclear weapons in the absence of a nuclear threat and provocations toward our government, and by no means spread nuclear weapons and technology.”
  • These steps are being billed as an “important process for global reduction of nuclear weapons, and our Republic has been supporting the international goals and efforts for comprehensive cessation of nuclear testing.” North Korea “will create a favorable international situation for socialist economic development, and for the protection of peace and stability on the Korean peninsula, and on the entire planet. It will activate a close bond and dialog with neighboring countries and the international community.”

News that North Korea has suspended missile and nuclear testing, and also closed down the nuclear test site in the north of the republic, caused an explosion in the world’s news media, so that a few of them even broadcast news such as “North Korea is ceasing its nuclear program.” As one could note, that is not quite so. No promises to renounce nuclear weapons were given, and North Korea proposed a moratorium on the development of a nuclear missile program first, then Russia and China.

For the most part, the moratorium was received positively. Donald Trump tweeted that “This is very good news for North Korea and the World – big progress! Look forward to our Summit.” South Korea’s president Moon Jae-in also said that the moratorium is “progress for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. This will create a favorable environment for achieving further success in the upcoming summit between North Korea and the USA.”

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs approved Pyongyang’s actions, “which through dialog and negotiations will promote relief of concerns of all interested parties, and facilitate the improvement of mutual relations.” This “will allow step-by-step improvement of the situation on the Korean peninsula, ensure denuclearization, and render assistance in reconciling existing contradictions in a peaceful way.”

Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzō Abe welcomed Pyongyang’s announcement, calling it “forward progress.” Along with that, he stressed that the main policy of Tokyo, and also of Washington and Seoul, remains unchanged with respect to North Korea, and called upon everyone to pay very close attention so that the announcement leads to the “complete, controllable, and irreversible destruction of nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, and ballistic missiles.” Japan’s Minister of Finance, Tarō Asō, also stated that Pyongyang’s intentions must be “carefully studied.”

South Korean political circles had mixed reactions to the North’s decision. If the ruling Democratic Party, Tŏburŏ, welcomed it, noting that it will provide “additional impulse to the movement toward peace and mutual prosperity on the Korean peninsula,” then the opposition party “Free Korea” expressed skepticism, stating that Pyongyang’s declaration does not correlate with the goal of “complete, verifiable, and irreversible” denuclearization. “Since there are already nuclear weapons in North Korea, its decision not to conduct further nuclear tests has little significance.”

This author shall comment on this step in the following way:

  • Upon completion of their own strategic nuclear forces, each of the nuclear powers ceased further tests of both missile and nuclear components of their program. In this case, Pyongyang’s behavior in no way differs from the “Big 5’s” conduct, and demonstrates the appropriate level of responsibility.
  • Although the announcement of the moratorium was contemplated long ago, it is curious that Kim played this card before the summit. That way, the moratorium does NOT look like the result of pressure on him, or that the South Korean side pushed him to do it. It has been a gesture of good will, and a conscious choice by Pyongyang from the very beginning.
  • It must be understood, however, that since the moratorium “cost Kim nothing,” this step may be perceived by Washington, not as movement to meet halfway, but an obligation. “In order to demonstrate its sincerity,” Pyongyang will have to accomplish something more, something that affects its interests, resembling readiness to capitulate.
  • With respect to top priority toward development of the economy, this is a logical continuation of the course begun a few years ago. Under this policy, the Defense Committee was renamed the State Affairs Commission, since the tasks of military development were, for the most part, completed and had less priority. So it is here. Since the program to create strategic nuclear forces has been completed, it is possible to switch attention to strengthening the economic sector, moreover that the struggle with the impact of the sanctions, and to increase the quality of life of citizens demand no-nonsense decisions.

By Konstantin Asmolov, Ph.D.,
Source: New Eastern Outlook


Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *